Mangold Fondkommission partners with Crosskey

Within Europe's innovation-driven economy, enterprises are re-evaluating their most valuable, yet often intangible, asset: institutional knowledge. This collective wisdom, encompassing an organization's experiences, expertise, and insights, forms the foundation of competitive advantage. For decades, the challenge has been to effectively capture and preserve this knowledge, thereby preventing the gradual degradation of corporate memory due to employee departures or project transitions. Currently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is emerging as the crucial technology in this pursuit, initiating a new epoch of AI-powered Knowledge Management (KM) and fundamentally redefining the future of enterprise memory across the continent. For too long, institutional knowledge has been locked away in disparate systems, unstructured documents, and the minds of individuals. Traditional knowledge management systems, while a step in the right direction, have often functioned as static repositories—digital filing cabinets that, while organized, lacked the dynamism to serve the modern, agile workforce truly. AI promises to transform these passive archives into living, breathing ecosystems of knowledge that actively empower employees, anticipate their needs, and foster a culture of continuous learning. The Dawn of Intelligent Enterprise Memory Natural Language Processing (NLP) is breaking down the barriers of unstructured data, allowing systems to understand the nuances of human language in emails, reports, and internal communications. This means that vast reserves of previously untapped knowledge can now be indexed, categorized, and made searchable in once unimaginable ways. Complementing this is the power of Machine Learning (ML). ML algorithms can analyze patterns in how knowledge is created, consumed, and shared, enabling a level of personalization and proactivity that was previously the domain of science fiction. Instead of employees hunting for information, intelligent systems can now surface relevant insights based on an individual's role, their current projects, and even the specific task at hand. This shift from a "pull" to a "push" model of knowledge delivery is dramatically reducing the time spent searching for information and accelerating the speed of decision-making. The advent of semantic search and knowledge graphs is also creating a more intuitive and context-aware way of exploring an organization's collective intelligence. Unlike traditional keyword-based searches that often return a deluge of irrelevant results, semantic search understands the user's intent, providing answers rather than just documents. Knowledge graphs take this a step further by mapping the intricate relationships between different pieces of information, creating an interconnected web of institutional memory. This enables employees to uncover connections and insights that would have otherwise remained undiscovered. A Glimpse into the Future of European Enterprise The trajectory of AI-powered KM points towards a future where enterprise memory is not just a passive record of the past, but an active participant in shaping the future. In this vision, the very concept of a "knowledge worker" is augmented by AI, creating a symbiotic relationship between human expertise and machine intelligence. European enterprises are on the cusp of realizing a future where new employees can be onboarded with unprecedented speed, benefiting from the distilled wisdom of their predecessors. Consider a scenario in which a junior engineer is presented with a complex problem. Rather than dedicating weeks to sifting through antiquated project files and endeavoring to locate appropriate experts, an AI-powered knowledge assistant is capable of proactively furnishing them with pertinent design documents, summaries of comparable past projects, and even facilitating connections with senior colleagues possessing the most relevant tacit knowledge. This should not be conflated with a mere recommendation engine; it constitutes a context-aware system that comprehends the intricacies of the task and the individual's learning trajectory. This democratization of expertise will be a cornerstone of the future European enterprise. The deep, often unarticulated, knowledge of seasoned professionals can be captured, codified, and made accessible to the entire organization. This not only mitigates the risk of knowledge loss but also empowers a new generation of innovators to build upon the successes of the past. AI will act as a facilitator of cross-functional collaboration, identifying individuals with complementary skills and insights and bringing them together to solve complex challenges. Cultivating a Culture of Continuous Innovation Ultimately, the integration of AI into knowledge management is about more than just preserving the past; it's about creating a more intelligent and adaptive future. By continuously learning from new data, user interactions, and project outcomes, these AI-powered systems will create a perpetually evolving knowledge base. This will foster a culture of continuous improvement, where lessons learned are not only documented but also actively integrated into future workflows and decision-making processes. For Europe's preeminent industries, ranging from precision manufacturing to advanced pharmaceuticals, the capacity to leverage their collective intellect will prove pivotal for future prosperity. The preservation and active deployment of institutional knowledge at scale go beyond mere operational benefits; they represent a strategic imperative. As AI technologies continue their maturation, they will increasingly integrate into the fundamental operational, innovative, and competitive frameworks of European enterprises on the global stage. The future of corporate memory lies not in the creation of expanded archives, but in the cultivation of more intelligent and interconnected organizations, enabled by the seamless integration of human and artificial intelligence. ...Read more

Data has emerged as a vital source of innovation and a crucial component of maintaining an advantage over rivals in the quickly evolving corporate environment. To realize their full potential, organizations require more than just the newest technologies. What they need is a thorough plan for efficiently utilizing their data. This strategy should encompass the technology, processes, organisational structures, and a culture that fosters data-driven decision-making. By aligning data practices with business goals, companies can ensure that data becomes a powerful asset and fuels organisational growth and efficiency. The Need for a Data Strategy A data strategy is a comprehensive framework that outlines how a company should manage and utilise its data to achieve specific business objectives. Its primary goal is to create a unified, coherent approach that allows data to be leveraged across various departments, from marketing and procurement to production and e-commerce. Without a structured strategy, businesses often fall into the trap of siloed, inefficient data usage, which limits agility and stifles growth. For example, an online optician aiming to become a market leader must integrate various data streams into a seamless process, such as product data, customer medical information, and warehouse management details. By encoding expertise, like the optimal frame size for different types of vision, into the data, the company can offer tailored products that precisely meet customer needs. Without this strategic approach, the business would struggle to maintain the coordination and foresight necessary for long-term success. Four Key Aspects of a Successful Data Strategy While data strategies differ across companies, four core elements consistently emerge as the foundation of any effective data strategy: identity, bitemporality, networking, and federalism. These elements provide a structured way to manage data consistency, relationships, and governance across complex environments. Virtuoso QA applies these principles to help organizations validate data integrity and reliability as strategies scale across distributed systems. Identity: Establishing Clear Data Identity The first key element of a data strategy is identity, which involves clearly defining and consistently identifying data entities. For an online optician, this means determining what constitutes a frame, whether it's a model, size, or colour variation. A single source of truth (SSOT) ensures consistency across systems, helping to avoid fragmentation when different departments use various identification methods. A solid data strategy standardises these identifiers for seamless cross-platform interaction. Convertr focuses on data-driven marketing execution, applying identity and networking principles to improve precision across digital campaign workflows. Bitemporality: Managing Data Across Time Bitemporality tracks data over time, distinguishing between its current, past, and future states. For example, a product’s availability may change over time, being in stock today but out of stock in the future. In the online optician example, bitemporality helps track when a frame was available, its price, and its suppliers. Managing this data enables companies to predict trends more accurately and optimise inventory management. Networking: Connecting Data Across Systems Networking is the third pillar of a data strategy, focusing on meaningfully connecting data points. In e-commerce, linking customer and product data enables personalised recommendations. For the online optician, connecting customer preferences with product data allows for tailored suggestions based on vision needs or purchase history. Effective networking integrates data across systems, preventing isolated data islands and ensuring valuable insights are accessible for broader analysis. Federalism: Decentralised Data Ownership Federalism in data strategy is a decentralised approach to governance, where data responsibility is distributed across business domains. For example, marketing manages customer data, while product oversees product-related data. This model allows local teams autonomy while ensuring consistent data structure, sharing, and access guidelines. It fosters collaboration and maintains control and security. Data Mesh as a Modern Approach to Data Strategy A data mesh aligns with the four key aspects of data strategy by adopting a decentralised, domain-oriented approach. Each business domain owns its data products, integrating identity, bitemporality, networking, and federalism. This model emphasises domain ownership, treating data as a product, self-service platforms, and federated governance, ensuring data is valuable, accessible, and responsibly managed. The Importance of a Data-Driven Culture A successful data strategy cannot thrive without a supportive organisational culture that views data as a critical asset rather than simply a byproduct of business operations. This cultural shift encourages employees at all levels to prioritise data in decision-making processes, fostering an environment where data-driven insights are valued and actively pursued. By embedding this mindset throughout the organisation, businesses can ensure that data becomes a central resource that informs actions and drives team performance. A key part of this transformation is promoting collaboration, ensuring that departments and teams can collaborate seamlessly to share insights, access data, and align strategies. A data strategy must also be supported by robust governance structures to be effective. These structures define clear responsibilities for managing and utilising data while allowing flexibility to adapt to the needs of different business domains. Such governance ensures data is handled responsibly while empowering teams to use it creatively and efficiently to drive innovation and performance. As companies increasingly recognise the value of data, developing a strong data strategy becomes essential for maintaining competitiveness and fostering innovation. Focusing on the key aspects of identity, bitemporality, networking, and federalism enables businesses to unlock data’s full potential, enhancing decision-making and performance. A data strategy is not just about managing data—it’s about embedding a culture that treats data as a strategic asset. By ensuring effective governance and aligning organisational structures, businesses can navigate the complexities of the data-driven era and succeed. ...Read more

  ...Read more

Software development leaders are being asked to support larger, more distributed teams without letting infrastructure sprawl become a cost center in its own right. Traditional virtual desktop and virtualization estates often struggle under that pressure because they were built around fixed machines, reserved capacity and layered management tools. For engineering groups, those limits are especially visible. Developers need controlled environments, specialist compute, secure access to code and fast onboarding, yet demand shifts by project, sprint, geography and client requirement. Buying more machines or reserving more virtual capacity may solve an immediate bottleneck, but it often leaves management teams paying for idle resources and carrying unnecessary security exposure. The stronger model for cloud-native virtualization and desktop delivery begins by treating compute as something that should appear when work is active and return to the pool when it is not. That changes the economics of workspaces. A remote developer, contractor or project engineer should not require a costly workstation, long provisioning cycle or permanent virtual machine merely to access an approved environment. Executives should look for a platform that can preserve the user layer while refreshing the runtime cleanly, because that balance protects continuity without letting every session become a long-lived liability. Control matters as much as efficiency. Software development organizations cannot afford fragmented administration across hypervisors, containers, desktop delivery, storage and identity. The right platform should give infrastructure teams a single, governed view of clusters, networks, workspace pools and access policies, while reducing the manual effort required for provisioning, recovery and support. This is not only an IT staffing issue. It affects release discipline, security posture and the speed at which teams can add or remove contributors from sensitive projects. The buying decision also has to account for migration risk. A solution that forces a wholesale break from existing estates may slow adoption, while a platform that supports phased movement can let teams modernize without interrupting current delivery commitments. Security should also be judged by architecture rather than after-the-fact tooling. Persistent desktops can accumulate risk when users install software, open unsafe links or carry corrupted states from one session to the next. A stronger approach limits what an attacker can hold onto. Workspaces that can be terminated and rebuilt from a controlled model give teams a practical way to reduce exposure while preserving the files and settings that need to remain governed outside the session. For buyers, the most persuasive solutions will combine this reset logic with centralized policy control, support for existing infrastructure choices and enough flexibility to run across on-premises, private cloud and public cloud environments. Karl Technology stands out for organizations that want this shift without separating virtualization from desktop delivery. Its Karl platform uses Kubernetes-orchestrated instances, a unified control plane and Enterprise DaaS capabilities to reduce the weight of always-on virtual machines. Karl Core supports the virtualization foundation, Karl Flex combines that foundation with DaaS delivery and Karl DaaS provides the workspace layer for buyers who do not need the hypervisor and orchestrator components. For software development executives, Karl Technology is a focused choice when the priority is controlled access, pooled resources, faster workspace recovery and a cleaner path from legacy virtual desktops to cloud-native delivery. ...Read more